“Emperors Club” and Teachers’ Comments

We finished watching the last half of the film today titled “Emperors Club” starring Kevin Kline.  It could have been acted by Robin Williams but this casting was much better with Kline as the classical history prof at a boy’s school.  Williams is so “out there” with his humor and character, especially in “Dead Poet’s Society” which we will be showing in a few weeks.

This movie is definitely about “character building” and it is part of the teacher’s job to mold and make each student into a better, more educated person.  Oh, I wish I could have tape recorded all the teachers’ comments from our discussion afterwards.  I told them they had to remember their thoughts and blog about them, so hopefully that will show up tomorrow when we have access to the computer lab.

One teacher said that sometimes fellow teachers are two-faced, they say one thing at teachers’ meetings and do another in the classroom. Another spoke up in response to my not liking the saying “There is no such thing as a bad student, only a bad teacher.” I said that put too much pressure on the teacher to perform.  She said there was one IT teacher in their university who was a horrible teacher, all the students complained about him.  All he did was use his cell phone during class and do anything but teach.  The judgment by the administration went against the students’ wishes, he was the son of a higher up in government and that was where he was to remain, being ineffective as a teacher.

One seasoned teacher said that she had been told by her administrators that a son of a big wig in government was going to be in her class.  Her superiors told her that she had better pay extra special attention to his needs. She felt offended that she was being told how to conduct her class, it seemed unfair to the other students.  However, when the boy came into her classroom, he was brilliant, he did not need special care, in fact, he was a delight.  However, this works against other teachers to have parents come in and insist that their children are good students.

That is why we started talking about assessment and that you had better show the criteria of how you are grading each student so at least it is well documented if there is any criticism against your teaching. Yes, evaluation of each student is key and we will probably talk more about that tomorrow and into next week.  We discussed when everyone in Kazakhstan can get only a 4 or 5 mark and it is rare that a 1 (being the worst) is given.  Although several in the class admitted they had gotten a 1 or 0 in their past.

Seemed that everyone had something to say on this topic of the good teacher in the movie and what he could have done instead of giving Sedgewick (the rebellious boy) a break.  They sympathized with the teacher when he was humiliated by his former student about that he didn’t have anything to show for his years of teaching. He had invested himself in many boy’s lives while Sedgewick prided himself that he was going to be a great senator like his father had been.  His father may have been a skillful politician who won elections but was he a “public servant?” I think there is a HUGE difference in the two like a “smart student” who knows how to pass tests compared to a student who learns to be a good citizen for the good of his or her country.

Principles and character, Sedgewick scorned his former teacher for having such ideals, no different than Sedgewick’s father had done to Mr. Hundret.  So, even though the diligent professor had wanted to help mold Sedgewick’s character, the father accomplished that instead.  What a poignant moment when Sedgewick told his former teacher that at his father’s death bed he was finally asked to “talk to him.” As soon as Sedgewick was about to speak, his father passed away.  Now as I write this, I’m not even sure that was true. It could have been a story he fabricated to gain his former teacher’s sympathies.  Sedgewick proved himself to be a liar and a cheat, but I don’t want to be a spoiler about this movie for those who haven’t seen it yet.

So many directions one could go with discussing the Emperors Club. 1) Politics and the importance of our democratic history in the U.S. going back to Julius Ceasar and even before him. 2) Parenting and the impact fathers have on their children. 3) Teachers and how they influence affluent children who are not loved or raised well. 4) children who turn out okay despite the grades they were given in school. 5) Teacher/student relationships for good or ill. Something we didn’t talk about was the romance relationship in the story.  Mr. Hundret seemed a proper gentleman and he did end up marrying the woman who encouraged him.  She had been earlier married to a very intelligent man who had gone on to be a professor at Oxford.  However, she got a divorce from this driven man and ended up with Hundret who made history come alive for her.

I have to add that Hundret as portrayed in the movie was not your typical history professor (though I deeply appreciated mine back in high school). He did not bore his students with facts but tried to make his lessons come alive.  He had shown discipline in rowing every day as he had also held up the yearly tradition of the Julius Ceasar competition. The boys in his class competed by knowing the facts of western civilization history.  He was very old school. In fact, Hundret was passed over when there was a promotion for him to become the school’s headmaster.  He was valued as a teacher but not as an administrator. Times were changing, they needed someone who had a sense of the bottomline.

The irony picks up there but again I don’t want to spoil the movie for those who have not seen it before.  I highly recommend it because it shows that sometimes cheaters and liars do seemingly get ahead in life. Sadly they also are empty and have to deal with a conscience.  May that not happen with the students at our new university in Astana, Kazakhstan. Hopefully the teachers will inculcate in each Kazakh student not only a desire to learn but also a reason behind the learning, sans the cheating.  That reason should be to help their fellow citizens in Kazakhstan to get ahead, not the ME FIRST and selfish attitude that Sedgewick played.  If there are too many of those kinds of leaders in any government, it will lead to no real education at all for the populace.  If one wants to rule as a good king or emperor of old, one needs to conquer one’s depraved self and invest time into being an example for others for the good of others.

2 Responses so far »

  1. 1

    […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Dr, Xavier Tolling. Xavier Tolling said: “Emperors Club” and Teachers' Comments « Kazakhnomad's Blog: A …: This movie is definitely about “character bu… http://bit.ly/9hCxEZ […]

  2. 2

    As I like the film so much, I watched it three times, and not against to watch it again. Excellent film!


Comment RSS · TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: